How original. I do like the walls, though. Wanna bet on how long untill someone posts a picture of them blue-screening?

1,206,830

One Million, Two Hundred Six Thousand, Eight Hundred and Thirty.

That’s the number of spam emails that did NOT make it thru to my domain. In one month. 31 days. That’s an average of 38,930 a day, or 1,622 an hour. There was one day where spamstopshere.com blocked 82,202 spam emails. In one day.

Unbelievable.

Just for comparison, 2,938, or 0.24% of all email traffic for the month of January, were “good” emails, and did make it thru. It also stopped 12 emails that contained viruses. Doesn’t worry me too much, but my dad runs Windows XP and 2000 on his machines, so he could’ve been affected.

It absolutely bewilders me how bad the spam problem has become, and that we’ve been able to do nothing more than intelligent filtering to stem the tide. Remember from my earlier post on the subject, there were points where I was receiving so much inbound junk mail that it was literally crashing my server. Not any more. My mail logs have grown less over the course of the past 35 some-odd days than they used to hourly. It’s been great.

At least in the snail-mail business, I don’t pay for the amount of inbound mail, the sender pays so there’s a “natural” valve. But because of the proliferation of shoddy operating systems that allow their host computers to become infected with malware email sending bots, the purveyors of this garbage have a virtually unlimited ability to push these bits thru the internet.

So, as I received the email that my trial period was ending, I gladly entered my credit card number into their system to sign me up as a paying customer. It bothers me that I have to pay to block something like this. However, I don’t begrudge a service like spamstopshere.com at all and will gladly pay them for the valuable service they provide.

The only reason the spammers keep at it is there’s money to be made. We need to choke off their air. Don’t ever purchase anything from someone who sent you an email you didn’t first ask them to send. And make sure your O/S is clean and your machine is not inadvertently pushing this spam at the behest of the spammers.

Rant off. I’m happy with spamstopshere.com. If you don’t have a spam solution, give them a try.

Here’s the scenario. I almost exclusively use my iPod in my car when on the road. One of the nicest features (on a long list, mind you) of my Q7 is the iPod interface. Plug the iPod into the dock connector under the arm rest and whammo, everything (except video) on the iPod is available thru the interface of the computer screen in the dashboard. Nice. Works great. Except for one thing.

Except for when the family is in the car with me, when they tend to drive the playlist, I listen almost exclusively to podcasts. I subscribe to 30 or so, which it plenty of content to keep up with on a weekly basis. I do this instead of radio. Much fewer commercials, content I’m interested in, and the ability to pause and pick up later when I get a phone call or reach my destination. Perfect.

The problem is in order to roll thru my content and get new content, I have to remove the iPod from the car, bring it in and physically plug it in to sync with the computer. Doesn’t sound like a big deal, but #1 it’s a little bit of a hassle to open up the special compartment below the arm rest and plug or unplug the iPod and #2 sometimes I forget (either leaving the iPod at home when I leave, or forgetting to get it out of the car when I come in. Then I have to wait 3 or 4 minutes for it to sync when I’m ready to get on the road. All minor annoyances, I agree, but still, it doesn’t have to be this way.

I’ve had wireless 802.11 (B then G and now N) at the house for 10 years now. Best thing since sliced bread. And the latest round of iPods (the Touch, based on the iPhone form factor) has 802.11 built in. My iPhone can see my wireless network from the driveway and garage. But here’s the rub: the iPod can’t sync with the host computer over the wireless network, even though it can see it. Why?

In the article I referred to above that I wrote just over 5 years ago now, I talked about a number of other pieces of functionality that would be nice. Of course, I was headed down the “Radio TiVo” path then, which is still a good idea and I still don’t see why it’s not built into modern car radios, but that was before podcasting. Now all the pieces are in place for such a combination.

I’d gladly buy an extra iPod Touch (just to leave in the car permanently) if I could do a few simple things with it that you currently CAN’T:

• Sync wirelessly with the host computer. I don’t care about multiple computers or other things that you’re currently limited to with the hard-cable syncing. That’s fine. I just want to be able to sync with my desktop in my office over the wireless network.
• Sync automatically on some sort of event. Either when the host computer notices an update to items synced with that device (like a new podcast download) or when the computer becomes “visible” because I just drove into the garage. It’s important for this to be automatic so that I don’t have to have some interface from within the car to start a sync and so that when I get ready to go, my device is as well.
• Smarter updating of many devices with current playhead location. It’d be nice if the meta-data information about current playhead location in a track would live a little more in the cloud. Especially if I have a MobileMe account.

With the app store and the programability of the new iPod Touch/iPhone platform, there could be some cool apps to help manage this functionality, but the core “sync over the air” functionality is going to have to be provided by Apple.

Come on, Apple, who do I have to bribe to get this done?

Guess it’ll be a while before a decently priced Blu-ray player hits the market now.

Looking forward to the clearance racks for HD-DVD, tho. Probably should pick up a (heavily) discounted second player as a backup.

As did Wal-mart.

And Best Buy.

Now, it looks like Toshiba is throwing in the towel.

Cue the fat lady.

UPDATE: You knew it would happen.

This is playing out like a soap opera. What’s next?

Which means, unfortunately, that a less capable, more restrictive, more expensive format will win this time around. Remember, Beta(max) was/is Sony’s format. And while Beta was superior to VHS, it was VHS that got home video off the ground. That was achieved by breaking the perceived pricing limits that the consumer will endure. HD-DVD players were on the market this Christmas at sub $100 levels (I saw some as low as $84 at one point). Blu-ray is struggling to break $400 consistently. Their spec isn’t completely fleshed out and implemented, their product line-up is confusing (all players can’t play all content, and some can’t be upgraded to do so in the future). HD-DVD, on the other hand, is a single solid spec and all players have all features of the spec, meaning one HD-DVD disc will play in all HD-DVD players, something consumers will assume (incorrectly) with Blu-ray.

The numbers of titles released have been roughly the same (458 BR to 429 HD as of this writing). While more Blu-ray players have been sold in the form of the PlayStation 3, more computer-based drives for HD-DVD have been sold, and the stand-alone dedicated players are selling 3:1 in favor of HD-DVD, driving almost certainly by price point. Yet, current statistics show a flip from an almost 60%/40% HD-DVD advantage in software units sold to a 60%/40% Blu-ray titles sold between 2006 and 2007. So why are so many more units (titles) selling on the Blu-ray side of the fence? My guess, in a word: Disney.

Here’s the deal. On average (we’re not talking about the strange ones like me), the average consumer will RENT titles that are PG-13 or R-type fare, but they BUY titles for the kids. The concept is pretty simple: the average adult doesn’t watch the same movie over and over. But kids do. The fact that Disney landed exclusively in the Blu-ray camp a while back was what turned the tide. Many of the top 10 titles are the same on either side of the fence, thanks to studios that have produced content in both formats to this point (Warner, being the biggest). However, now that Warner has chosen a side, things are looking pretty grim for the HD-DVD camp. So much so, that in the wake of this announcement from Warner, the HD-DVD Promotional Group has cancelled its press conference scheduled for THIS SUNDAY at CES in Vegas. Ouch indeed.

I have an already significant investment in HD-DVD at this point (40+ titles so far). While the news has a certain degree of initial sting to it, in the long run it doesn’t bother me too much. I knew anyway at some point I’d get a Blu-ray player and hook it up as another device in my system.

It’s a bit disappointing, though, especially from a consumer’s point of view. The Blu-ray feature list has some serious problems. There have been production issues in both the media and the players. The price is too high. I’m sure Blu-ray will get over these problems eventually. But will the player I buy today be able to be upgraded to the format of tomorrow? I say that bet’s 50:50.

So, what’s the other shoe to drop? Look for that at Mac World at the end of the month. I have a sneaking suspicion that Apple’s going to announce not only a shipping Blu-ray burner in their machines, but an upgrade to DVD Studio Pro that will enable Blu-ray authoring. Do you think Disney going Blu-ray was coincidence? Who sits on Disney’s board and is their largest single shareholder? That’s right, Steve Jobs.

Now I just want an Apple TV that fixes all the problems I wrote about a few months ago, and has a Blu-ray drive in it. Is that so much to ask for?

Only about 45 minutes.

Yes, it’s cool.

Very cool.

Very, very cool.

wow.

June 29.

Time to get in line.

Being an Apple guy and an Apple integrator, I’m most interested in what Cupertino has been up to. Here’s what it boils down to:

• Final Cut Pro 6. They’ve expanded and refined the capabilities of RT Extreme to more gracefully deal with multiple formats in the same timeline. They’ve made the UI a little more friendly by asking you if you want to set up a new sequence’s settings based on the first clip you drag in. They’ve made roundtripping to the other apps a little smoother, including templating of motion projects. They’ve increased the usage of FXPlug filters, including some technology from Shake for motion tracking and shake removal. And they’ve added the new Apple ProRes 4:2:2 codec for extremely efficient HD resolution with 4:2:2 colorspace in SD filesizes.
• Motion 3. This is perhaps the strongest upgrade in the lot. Motion is now fully 3-D in it’s capabilities, from cameras to lighting to particle systems to text effects to behaviors. They’ve added an extremely cool new feature to the HUD to control the positioning and movement of objects in 3-D space without the normal complexities of dealing with many objects in the scene. They’ve added significant new filters with FX Plug technology, including some inheritance from Shake. Very cool indeed.
• Soundtrack Pro 2. Surround sound. Advanced take management and audio restoration tools. Multipoint spotting display. Podcasting. All around, a significant upgrade to an already powerful tool.
• Compressor 3. This appears to be almost a from-the-ground-up rewrite of compressor as we’ve known it. New workflow to include migration of transcoded assets to remote servers, dozens of new presets, the ability to overlay animated watermarks and timecode burn-ins at transcode, and more efficient use of multi-core Macs, this is a strong contender.
• Color. Here’s something groundshaking. Apple bought Final Touch last year, and now we see that repackaged with enhancements into Color. While it is a first-class color timing package (not just a set of filters), the amazing thing is what was once a $5,000+ package is now “in the box.”
• The Rest. DVD Studio Pro remains unchanged at version 4. Live Type 2 and Cinema Tools are unchanged as well. But in the box with all of these other tools at a price point of $1,299 new and $499 upgrade… simply astounding.

I look forward to getting my hands on these tools when they finally ship in May. Go check out all the demos at Apple.

I’m curious about the DVDSP non-upgrade, tho. Methinks this has to do with hardware arrangements more than anything. There’s got to be a reason they’ve been shipping the Mac Pro towers with two optical bays… I think Apple hasn’t finalized negotiations with Blu-Ray and HD-DVD burner providers, and is holding the next version of DVDSP until those arrangements are made. Surely that won’t slip until next NAB.

The other huge introduction, as if the above isn’t enough, is Final Cut Server. FCS is a repackaging of Proximity’s ArtBox media asset server product, which Apple purchased back in December 2006. Used in conjunction with Xsan systems, it looks to be a very powerful way to aggregate and catalog media in a production environment. And the price point again is hard to beat: $999 for 10 concurrent users, and $1,999 for unlimited users. This will be very useful for some of my clients.

Since I’ve only a day more on the floor, I’m going to hit it commando-style tomorrow and try to see as much as I can. I need to ask some more questions at Apple’s booth, since that most directly relates to things that make money for me, but I want to see what else is out there as well. Let’s hope the old feet hold up.

Then February came and I got a nice little email from Apple saying that they really needed a couple more weeks to make things perfect. So it wouldn’t be shipping until March. Well, OK. I can understand that.

Then the middle of March came and went and no ship notice from Apple. Getting a little nervous, I went back thru the specs that Apple had published on the device, as well as several tech blogs that had been speculating and previewing it. And finally I decided that it just might not do everything I really wanted it to do. So, three days before it finally shipped, I cancelled my order.

Fast forward about three weeks to today. As part of our monthly Final Cut Pro User’s Group meeting, I’ve been called upon to review the device and demonstrate it for the group. So a buddy of mine drops his brand new AppleTV off to me last night and I spent a few hours playing with it. Here’s my review.

It’s pretty cool. But, it’s version 1.0.

OK, first, what is it? The easiest way to explain what AppleTV is is this: it’s an iPod for your TV. It behaves almost exactly like an iPod with respect to it’s interaction with and reliance upon iTunes. It shows up in iTunes as a device, just like an iPod. The preference panels are almost identical, allowing you to select what to sync with it, and it has an internal hard drive that caches the synced content, just like an iPod. The only real difference is it can stream from other iTunes machines on the network.

Even the unboxing was remarkably similar to the iPod experience. The package is the same slipcase design that the new iPods ship in, an unfolding container in a sleeve. The packaging is distinctively Apple. Clean, elegant, efficient, inviting. “Designed by Apple, Inc. in California.” The whole schtick. In the box is the unit itself (a little lighter than I expected), a power cord, the “gum package” Apple remote, and a sleeve of thin manuals. No fluff. Just what one has come to expect from modern Apple packaging.

After peeling the cellophane wrapping off of the unit and remote, I unplugged the HDMI cable from my HD-DVD player and plugged it into the AppleTV, and then plugged the power cord in. No on/off switch. I flipped my TV to the second HDMI input and the Apple logo appeared on the screen.

Once of the touches that makes Apple products distinctively Apple is the fit and finish of the user experience. AppleTV lives up to that expectation (for the most part, more on that later). Instead of jarring visuals that blink on and off, the screen is very clean and elegant. Transitions from one screen to the next are dissolves. The remote is simple and works just as you’d expect. Holding the up or down button down will scroll quickly thru lists, picking up speed as it goes. But I never seemed to overshoot what I was aiming for. They really seemed to spend some time and effort timing the interface and navigation. It felt very natural.

Setup was a breeze. I intentionally noted the time so I could see how long it would take to get things going. I didn’t need to. It took 3 minutes. After showing the Apple logo for a few seconds, the screen faded and then showed me a list of the wireless networks that the unit could find (6 in my case). I selected my network, and the unit let me know that the network was a closed wireless network, and gave me a virtual keyboard on the screen where I could “type” the password (upper- and lowercase, numbers and symbols). After a couple of tries at remembering my password it immediately attached to the network and found the machines I had on that had iTunes running.

The next screen showed a 5 digit code. Looking at my notebook’s iTunes screen, I noticed that the AppleTV had appeared in my device list on the left with a small message “click to setup”. Clicking on it AppleTV item in the list, I was immediately asked for the 5 digit code from the screen. After entering the code, the system informed me that setup was complete and ran the AppleTV intro video (very slick, reminded me of the TiVo setup complete movie).

My iTunes began to sync with the AppleTV, moving content from my library to the unit. As the content flowed into the unit, it started showing up as I navigated around the menus. Video content first, then music. Photo syncing was disabled by default, but after checking the box on the Photos tab, iTunes began to sync pictures down to the AppleTV.

Some things I noticed while playing around for a couple of hours:

• As I said above navigation is very smooth and intuitive. Anyone could navigate this system and find what they’re looking for. There is room for improvement, but if you have your iTunes library organized well, that will translate directly down to the AppleTV, just like it does to the iPod.
• The “screen saver” features are very cool. When playing music, the album artwork flips sides every 20 seconds or so. After a couple of minutes (configurable), the true screen saver kicks in, showing a collection of photos floating in space, doing a 360-degree fly-around every 30 seconds or so. Very, very nice effect. However, it’s not random. The selection of the pictures can be random, but the fly-by pattern is very predictable and the same every time. That’s a little bit of fit and finish that could be better.
• The remote is the same that came with my MacBook Pro, and it was annoying that every time I hit the menu button to control the unit, Front Row would come up on my MBP. I don’t know of a way to dedicate a remote to a particular unit. I know there must be a way, but it’s not obvious. That could be better.
• When selecting a movie or video that you weren’t finished with last time, the system brings up the current frame from where you left off, blurred, with an overlay that asks if you want to resume or start from the beginning. Very nice touch.
• When playing video, syncing stops. It seems to work fine as long as music is being played… syncing continues in the background. But when you start a video, any sync in progress is cancelled. Within seconds of stopping the video, the sync picks back up and continues. Interesting, and nice way to make it feel seemless. Makes me think that decoding and playing out video is rather taxing on the unit, or that Apple is being conservative about bandwidth and cancels a sync just in case you’re streaming the video over the air. I haven’t tried, but I wonder if the same holds true when the unit is wired into the network instead of using 802.11n.

After playing with the unit for a couple of hours, I’m very tempted to get one to stay. However, there are a few nagging details and deficiencies that I’ve found, confirming my suspicion that caused me to cancel my order before they shipped.

• The unit doesn’t play VOB files (raw VIDEO_TS folders, or rips of DVDs). My goal is to rip my DVD collection and have it available at any time at my media center without having to go hunt for a disk. That includes, especially, the director’s commentary and subtitles. Here’s the deal: I’ve ripped to H.264 about 30 of my DVDs, mainly to have available for trips on the iPod or on the computer to occasionally have running in the background while working on other things. This works great, and those ripped MP4 files play fine on the Apple TV (see the point on that below). However, currently ripping to MP4 doesn’t support alternate audio, selectable subtitles, or chapter stops. Those are biggies in my mind. The easiest way that AppleTV could deal with that in my opinion is allowing you to point it at a network share and have it recognize VIDEO_TS folders within. This could be fixed with a software upgrade. We’ll see.
• Resolution. The resolution setting menu indicates the unit can output 720p, 1080i, 546p, 480p, and 720p50 or 1080i50 (for the European crowd, I guess). I didn’t notice any appreciable difference between 1980x1080i and 1280x720p. The menus are extremely crisp, but when playing video, it was noticeably soft. This was especially true of a 640×480 DVD rip (to be somewhat expected), but also true of a true 720p .MOV that I moved over to the unit. By contrast, by Toshiba HD-A1 HD-DVD player scales up SD DVDs exceptionally well. The Incredibles, for example, looks stunning on my Samsung 67″ in 1080i. I’m a little concerned that the processor in the AppleTV is a little underpowered for HD content at higher bit-rates.
• Photo viewing is a little jerky. You have the option to select different effects and apply the “Ken Burns” move on photos when viewing a slideshow, but the starts and stops aren’t near as fluid as they are on the built-in screen saver in OS X. I was thinking this unit could double as a picture frame (like the one I built), but it’s not near as pleasing to watch. Looks like Apple didn’t quite finish this feature out. Also, there’s no apparent way to scroll thru pictures, only play them in a slideshow fashion.
• Another problem with photos is during the “screen saver”, the photos seem to be a little squished. I don’t think the software is respecting the aspect ratio of the images… might just be me. I need to throw a calibration image in a see if it really is warped.
• Podcasts. Podcasting is a perfect delivery method and content source for this unit, especially as more and more video podcasts become available. However, because of it’s direct tie to an iTunes library running on another computer, there’s no way to aggregate podcast content on this box directly. There should be a way to subscribe the AppleTV itself to RSS feeds (it is on the network, after all), and let the content flow directly down to the box. I would definitely subscribe to more video podcasts (and watch them eventually), if they were on the box directly, but I don’t necessarily want them taking up space on my main computer.
• Photocasts. Just like RSS with enclosures (podcasts), Apple missed a huge opportunity to tie the Photocasting idea from iPhoto into this unit. Image this: I purchase an AppleTV for my kids grandparents, and subscribe them to a Photocast of the latest pictures of the kiddos. Now they have a photoframe of their grandkids continuously updated, right there on the big screen in the living room. Huge deal.
• Purchases. There’s no way to purchase directly from this box. There’s a real missed opportunity for Apple here, in my opinion. I should be able to browse the iTunes store for content, preview and purchase, all from my couch. As it stands, I can preview minimally (the top 10 videos on the store), but if I want to purchase one I have to go to the other room, log in, find the item again, purchase it, let it download, and sync to watch it on my TV. Not the experience that sells this box, I’m afraid. Once again, I think this could be remedied with a software upgrade, but I think these things would be flying off the shelf a lot faster if the whole experience was seemless.
• Internet Streaming. On top of not being able to make purchases on the unit, you can’t browse and stream video from popular sharing sites like YouTube either. I’m not sure this is completely a downside, as the average consumer is probably not going to want to try to search for that type of content without a keyboard, nor watch poorly transcoded flash video on a 60″+ screen. But the fact remains that Apple TV is a network-connected device that doesn’t take advantage of the Internet like it probably should.
• The trailers don’t seem to be completely up to speed with Apple’s trailer site. Plus, there’s no way to resort the list to see the newest trailers up top, only alphabetical. The system should alert me when there are trailers I haven’t seen, show me which ones they are, and let me find things either by release date, title, genre, etc. That would be much more useful and user friendly.
• The hard drive is entire too small for a unit of this type. With movies from the iTunes store weighing in at 1.5GB or so and TV shows at 500-600MB, this unit won’t hold much. Even my TiVo has a 250GB drive in it. Apple put a USB2 on the unit, but designated it for “service and diagnostics” only. They should’ve come out of the chute with the ability to buy an off-the-shelf external USB drive and plug it in for additional storage. And as I said above, I should be able to point the unit at a network share with content as well. I know it can stream from multiple iTunes libraries, but switching between streaming computers is a little clumsy, and the setup time to display library information is annoyingly long. I should be able to point the unit at multiple libraries or shares, have it aggregate and cache the content meta-data, and present it in a unified interface. I shouldn’t have to care that video A is coming off of the computer in my office while video B is coming off the local drive. In fact, when I start playing video A from the remote computer and get 5-10 minutes into it non-stop, the AppleTV should go ahead and copy the remainder to the local drive and play it from there. That’s what the internal drive should be used for, a cache of recent or most accessed content.

Overall, the AppleTV is a very nice unit and very close to the right price point. I think it would probably sell like gangbusters in its present form at $199, but the $299 could easily be justified by the masses if a few of the above criticisms were addressed. While I’m probably going to go ahead with plan B, putting a Mac Mini in instead, I’ll be very interested to see what Apple TV version 2.0 looks like.

And I bet we see it before Christmas.

The idea is pretty simple. There are slowly becoming available from several companies digital picture frames, usually around 7″ in size that will display photos from digital cameras, but appear on your bookcase like a regular frame. While they do the job, they don’t do it particularly elegantly. Some of the problems I’ve seen are the fact that a) the screen is small, b) they require moving photos onto a memory card and changing that out on the frame, c) they either simply change the pictures out every few minutes or do some cheesy animation, and d) are very expensive for what they do. I wanted to do something more elegant.

It’s hard to say I achieved “D” completely (it was, after all a $3,000 notebook at one point), but seems to be worth around $200 on e-bay now, seeing as it’s about 7 years old. And it was, after all, just lying around not doing anything particularly productive. So we’ll call that one a wash.

Hardware-wise, I was in good shape. While not particularly powerful by today’s standards, it was a 500Mhz notebook with a very nice 14″ screen, a 12GB hard drive and built in wireless 802.11b networking. It runs OS X very nicely, and one of the built-in screen savers under OS X takes a folder of photos and does a slow cross-fade and zoom in/out animation that is visually very pleasing. So the mechanics from a software standpoint should be very straighforward… load up a folder with pictures, point the screen saver at it and let it rip.

I took a field trip to Aaron Brothers, and located a 15-inch shadowbox frame that is about 3 inches deep. Along with the shadowbox, I bought a sheet of black foam-core, and headed back to the house.

Before getting started, I did a fresh install of OS X on the notebook and made sure everything was working properly.

The first step was to disassemble the notebook and lose as much as I could and still have it remain functional. This meant losing the battery, the CD-ROM drive, the modem, and lots of plastic. I tried to pull the battery charging circuitry (the small circuit board jutting up from the main board that fits between the battery and CD-ROM bays), but it appears as though there was some elements of the power inverter there, since when I removed it the machine wouldn’t boot.

Removing the screen from the plastic bezel was challenging, but soon I had nothing but the glass itself and the cable that connects it to the main circuit board removed. Also removed from the screen bezel was the antenna assembly for the integrated 802.11 wireless.

The next step was to lay out all the remaining components on the foam backing of the shadowbox. This was a little tricky, since the main circuit board with the power inverter daughterboard was about 3/4″ too tall for the shadowbox. Had I been able to remove that daughterboard, it would’ve fit perfectly. As it was, I had to cant the circuit assembly about 15 degrees to make it all fit. I then proceeded to use small screws to affix everything to the foam backing of the box, carefully laying out the antenna assembly, the hard drive, the CMOS battery, etc. I also used a bit of gaffer’s tape to hold wires in place. I cut a small notch in the back of the foam to allow the power cord for the computer and a USB extension cable to come out of the box.

Next, I cut the foamcore to fit the opening in the front of the shadow box, and then cut a hole 1/4″ smaller than the size of the screen. Using an Xacto knife, I beveled the foamcore to create a mount for the screen, and then placed the screen in and used gaffers tape to hold it in place. The black foamcore acts as a matte for the screen, making it look like it goes perfectly with the frame.

Final assembly consisted of placing the foamcore mounted screen in the front of the box, and then placing the computer mounted back of the box on the rear, and using the frame screws to hold everything in place. At this point, the only thing exposed was the power and USB cables coming out of the back.

The moment of truth came when I applied power and it actually booted! It was a little strange seeing the OS X boot screen on this rather odd-looking Mac, but with a keyboard and mouse hooked up to the USB cable protruding from the back of the box, I had a working computer. I configured the wireless to attach it to the network and was ready to go.

I moved it into place on the bookshelf in our family room, and ran the power cable and USB cable down behind the bookcase, giving a very clean look. I enable remote desktop access in the system preferences and disconnected the keyboard and mouse.

Now I can remotely access the frame from my MacBook Pro or desktop mac, and load images onto the picture frame remotely. I’ve got it set to automatically wake itself up at 10:00 in the morning, and put itself to sleep at 9:00 at night. One minute after waking up the screen saver kicks in and the pictures start playing. I disabled the feature to put the screen to sleep, so it plays pictures all day long. It’s very quiet and quite intriguing from a conversation piece perspective.

I’ve actually experimented with having it automatically download pictures to display, since it’s always on the network. The way I’d like things to work is to have it monitor an RSS feed (i.e. photocast), download new images and throw them into the loop. Since photocasting on iPhoto is tied very tightly to .Mac, I haven’t been able to get that working satisfactorily, but now that I have a .Mac account, I’ll have to revisit that idea.

Extending the concept from here would be very easy… I can easily envision a further RSS enabled screen saver that not only plays pictures, but shows stories from news sites or blogs, occasionally shows the weather, etc. I’m not sure I really want to go there, however, since I really wanted a lean-back experience, passive in its presentation. I think that type of interaction is better suited for a device like an Apple TV hooked up to the big screen.

One thing that would be very cool, however, would be to put a frame like this at the grandparents house, having it subscribed to a photocast of pictures I publish, automatically updating remotely. It’s a great way to share photos with family and friends in a totally 21st century way. I really don’t see why this frame couldn’t be mass-produced for around the pricepoint of the 7″ frames that are on the market right now, and be much more elegant. What would you pay for such a device? I can see people easily paying $299 to put such a gadget in the grandparents home, especially if it was very easy to set up and well integrated with the other infrastructure (iPhoto, photocasts, etc.).

I’ve got an old titanium powerbook G4 lying around now; I’m thinking about making a portrait version as my next project. The trick there will be finding a frame… the titanium has a widescreen layout, not a standard aspect ratio.

I had already heard that Microsoft has agreed to pay Universal a fee for every player sold. Which is totally ludicrous. Why does Universal deserve a dime for the sale of a device that may never have Universal content on it?

Next in line is the fact that the DRM (Digital Rights Management, the technology that actually takes your rights away) that Microsoft has chosen to employ in the Zune eco-verse, is completely incompatible with prior versions of DRM that they’ve deployed in the past with Windows Media Player. Bought some tunes in the past thru Microsoft and want to play them on your brand new (ugly as sin) Zune? Out of luck. Buy it again.

And now we get to the one that will probably kill early adopters: Points. It appears as though when you go to the Zune store to purchase content, you don’t spend dollars, you buy points and then spend the points on the content. Not only does this completely obscure the actual price for the content you’re purchasing, but the math is set up in such a way that it’s very complicated to “zero” your account out. Which means either you’re going to leave money on the table (giving Microsoft more per content item than the price would indicate), or you’ll buy more and more points to be able to evenly spend everything in your account. Either way, you spend more money.

Couple all of that with the fact that the device is larger and uglier than an iPod and something tells me that this whole Zune thing is not going to catch on as fast as Microsoft thinks it will.

via Vowe.

I’m sure it saves the wear and tear on using your regular DVD player to rewind your movies before returning them to Blockbuster or Netflix.

And look! It works with HD-DVD and Blu-Ray too!

If you don’t get it (or see why you need one too), look at the category of this post. No, the other category.